fighters with tattoos, fighters without

Robert_Lake · 10-25-2006

I have found in my years of watching MMA, that usually the guys with no tattoos or less tattoos than their opponents usually seem to do better. It sounds ridiculous i know, but next time you are watching a fight, i bet you anything the guy with the least amount of tattoos will win. Has anyone else noticed this?

TapLV · 10-25-2006

They typically concentrate on fighting, not being a bad ass.

Jason · 10-26-2006

Quote:

Originally Posted by Robert_Lake

I have found in my years of watching MMA, that usually the guys with no tattoos or less tattoos than their opponents usually seem to do better. It sounds ridiculous i know, but next time you are watching a fight, i bet you anything the guy with the least amount of tattoos will win. Has anyone else noticed this?

LOL That does seem to happen alot.

Alex E. and Arona are a couple of the few fighters that come to mind when thinking about guys with alot of tatts that actually win more than lose. Or one large one in the case of Arona.

silent_samurai15 · 10-26-2006

lol ive noticed..

i think fighters without tattoos look more like fighters.. fighters with tattoos look like thugs that are trying to look cool.
kinda like how i think fightshorts look better on fighters then long shorts, because it makes them look more like fighter... or is it just me?

its like wandy.. he looked badass with just the one tattoo on his head and his fightshorts... but now he has a load of tattoo and wears long shorts he looks just like everyone else and has started to lose a little more.